IT marketing teams were promised more content. They got it. A year later, the complaint from sales has changed: it used to be “this isn’t about our client”. Now it’s “this sounds like AI”.
Both complaints have the same cause. The writer, human or model, didn’t know enough about the buyer or the company to say something only you could say.
Slop is a context problem
A model with no context fills the gap with the most likely sentence. For IT services, the most likely sentence is the one every competitor already published: transformation, innovation, unlocking value.
More prompting doesn’t fix it. Each new chat starts from zero, so the writer retells the company story, pastes the case study and corrects the buyer’s priorities, every time.
“We say AI, and we show up like an old-school company.”— CMO, MID-SIZE IT SERVICES FIRM
Three tells a CIO spots in a paragraph
- No number. Real work has a result. “Faster claims” is a claim; “claims settled 40% faster” is proof.
- No buyer. The paragraph would read the same to a CFO and a CISO.
- No point of view. It agrees with everyone, so it says nothing.
Start from proof, not from a prompt
The fix is upstream of the writing. When every draft starts from what your company has actually done, for this buyer, the slop has nowhere to come from.
Notice what changed. Not the model, and not the prompt. The second sentence has a buyer, a number and a point of view, because the writer started from all three.
What to do this quarter
None of this needs a bigger content team. It needs every writer to start from the same brain.
Spent his career in IT sales and marketing. Now building the company brain he wished he’d had.